Legal Opinion

Mendini v. Milner

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1929No. 5091PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Respondents have moved to dismiss this appeal on the ground that notice of appeal was not served on all adverse parties.

Within the statutory time a notice of appeal addressed to “the plaintiffs in the above-entitled action and to Robert C. Brown, defendant, and to Bissell & Bird, attorneys for said plaintiffs and defendant” was filed and service accepted by Bissell & Bird. This notice and proof of service thereof appear in the record.

On the same day a notice addressed to “Twin Falls Land & Water Company, Twin Falls Canal Company, J. J. Rugg, William A. Winters, Jess O. Eastman and Ralph B.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Stephens v. ConleyMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Heinlen v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Warren v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Sweaney & Smith Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Knowlton v. MackenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Robinson v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Maudlin v. MaudlinIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Turner v. PurdumIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Common School Dist. No. 58 v. LundenIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Application of BennionIdaho Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API