Heinlen v. Heilbron
California Supreme Court
Motion in the Supreme Court to dismiss an appeal from the Superior Court of Tulare County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Motion to dismiss the appeal.
In this action, pending in the county of Tulare, the superior court of that county made an order on the ninth day of February, 1891, denying the defendants’ motion for a new trial. The attorney for the defendants resided and had his office in Fresno, and on the 28th of March, 1891, filed with the clerk of the above court a notice of an appeal by the defendants from the order denying their motion for a new trial. On the day previous, he had deposited in the post-office at Fresno a registered letter, containing a copy of the notice of appeal, inclosed in a sealed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Sichler v. LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Perri v. BeaumontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by55 opinions
- Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Shearman v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Colyear v. TobrinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Forslund v. ForslundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Hunstock v. Estate Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1943
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.