Legal Opinion

Ryer v. Ryer

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1895No. S. F. No. 113PublishedCited by 55 opinions

Motion in the Supreme Court to dismiss an appeal from an order denying a new trial in the matter of the application of Christopher B. Ryer for partial distribution of the estate of Washington M. Ryer, deceased. Walteb H. Levy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Motion to dismiss the appeal. The last will and testament of Washington M. Ryer, deceased, was admitted to probate and letters testamentary *559issued thereon July 13, 1892, and after the expiration of four months therefrom the appellant herein, claiming to be an heir of the deceased, presented his petition to the superior court for the share of the estate to which he claimed to be entitled. To this petition the executors and certain of the heirs and legatees of the deceased filed their answers, and the issues thus presented were tried by the court, and judgment rendered denying the petition. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re BauquierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Harper v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Barnhart v. FulkerthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. In re Estate of MedburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Watson v. SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. De La Cuesta v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. In Re Estate of KilbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. In Re Estate of ColtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Dougherty v. DoughertyMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. California Trust Co. v. CassidyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API