Legal Opinion
Wynn v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 6, 1993No. 11170PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This appeal arises from the plaintiff’s application to compel the defendant, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company, to arbitrate her claim pursuant to the underinsured motorist provision of her insurance policy. The plaintiff claims that, in denying her application, the trial court improperly (1) found that the statute of limitations was a threshold issue, (2) found that the statute of limitations had run prior to the filing of this application, and (3) failed to render a decision on her postjudgment motion to reconsider. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Ecker v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Beloff v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Wilson v. Security Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Berkshire Mutual Insurance v. BurbankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Gabrielle v. Hospital of St. RaphaelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Engelman v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Polizos v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Wynn v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.