Beloff v. Progressive Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtSantaniello, J.
The dispositive issue in this consolidated appeal, is whether, at the relevant times, General Statutes §§ 38-175a through 38-17561 governed *48motorcycle insurance policies so as to mandate that such policies provide uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage, and that disputes about coverage *49issues arising out of such policies be submitted for final consideration to binding arbitration. We hold that there was no such mandate.
The underlying facts are not in dispute. In Beloff v. Progressive Casualty Ins. Co., Docket No. 12827, Wayne Beloff was operating a motorcycle on October 26,1982, when he…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Hayes v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Mahoney v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. James G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Crest Pontiac Cadillac, Inc. v. HadleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Szudora v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.