Legal Opinion

Wynn v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 1, 1994No. 14788PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action pursuant to General Statutes § 52-4101 to compel arbitration of an underinsured motorist insurance claim, the principal issue is whether a defense alleging the expiration of the statute of limitations raises a threshold issue of arbitrability to be determined by the court, or a coverage issue to be determined by the arbitrator. Holding that the applicable statute of limitations had run, the trial court denied the application of the plaintiff, Nedra F. Wynn, to compel the defendant, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company, to arbitrate her claim for compensation.

In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stankiewicz v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Wynn v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. State v. LeonardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Wynn v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Berkshire Mutual Insurance v. BurbankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Engelman v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Polizos v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Gohel v. Allstate InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Perez-HendersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API