Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Security Insurance Group
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 13, 1986No. 12651PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The plaintiff, James Wilson, brought this action to compel arbitration of his claim against the defendant, Security Insurance Group, based upon a policy of automobile insurance issued to the town of Woodbridge. His complaint alleges that this policy provides uninsured motorist coverage for his benefit with respect to injuries he received while on duty as a police officer of the town when he was struck by an unidentified automobile that fled the scene of the accident.
*620The defendant insurer filed a counterclaim seeking a declaratory judgment to determine two issues relating to the coverage…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reetz v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Mount St. Mary's Hospital v. CatherwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Glidden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Bd. of Educ. of Carlsbad v. HarrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- City of New Haven v. AFSCME, Council 15, Local 530Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Bodner v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.