Legal Opinion

Berkshire Mutual Insurance v. Burbank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 16, 1996PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

At issue is the time the statute of limitations begins to run on an action for underinsured motorist benefits. The plaintiff, Berkshire Mutual Insurance Co. (Berkshire), argues that the statute begins to run on the date of the accident or, in the alternative, on the date when the insured discovers that the tortfeasor is underinsured. The defendant, Bouldin G. Burbank, argues that the statute begins to run on the date the insurer violates the insurance contract. Berkshire commenced this action for declaratory judgment, and a Superior Court judge allowed Berkshire’s motion for sum*660mary…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Lane v. Grange Mutual CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Royal-Globe Insurance v. CravenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Allstate Insurance Company v. SpinelliSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  4. Dittemore v. DickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Safeco Insurance Co. v. BarcomWashington Supreme Court · 1989

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Aponte-Correa v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  2. Hamm v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. Locator Services Group, Ltd. v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. John Beaudette, Inc. v. Sentry Insurance a Mutual Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  5. Snyder v. CaseNebraska Supreme Court · 2000

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API