Gabrielle v. Hospital of St. Raphael
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendants.1 The plaintiff asserts that the trial court improperly rendered the summary judgment because (1) by its action, the trial court, in effect, set aside the plaintiff’s automatic ninety day extension of the statute of limitations that had been granted by the clerk, (2) the defendants should have been required to appeal from the granting of the ninety day extension of time, (3) it improperly found that the automatic extension of time does not provide an automatic suspension of the running of the statute of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- LeConche v. ElligersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Ecker v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Nor'easter Group, Inc. v. Colossale Concrete, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Whalen v. IvesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Rockwell v. QuintnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Rios v. CCMC CORPORATIONConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Durkin Village Plainville, LLC v. CunninghamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.