Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Anderson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 30, 1997No. C6-96-48PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

On April 19,1996, this court publicly reprimanded respondent for neglecting his client’s employment law matters and placed him on two year’s supervised probation subject to numerous conditions. In re Anderson, 546 N.W.2d 298 (Minn.1996). The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility petitioned for revocation of probation and further discipline of respondent alleging that respondent had refused to cooperate with the Director’s office regarding his probation conditions. The Director further alleges that respondent had committed several additional counts of misconduct…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LochowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MadsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against FlanerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against BrehmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against DanielsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  4. In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against ZatzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API