Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Boyd

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 28, 1988No. C3-87-1439PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

The Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for discipline against respondent, James J. Boyd, on July 27, 1988. The parties agreed to dispense with formal panel proceedings pursuant to R.Law.Prof.Resp. 10(a), and the matter was subsequently heard by a court-appointed referee. Following the hearing, the referee issued findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended a 4-month suspension. The director’s office and respondent then entered into a stipulation for discipline incorporating the referee’s recommendations. After consideration, this court rejected the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Matter of Discipline of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Action Against FrankeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re the Discipline of SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Matter of Discipline of FlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Petition of Disciplinary Action Against DafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AitkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GheritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against HaugenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against JagielaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against DvorakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API