Legal Opinion

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Zatz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 2000No. C9-98-209Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Peter Bruce Zatz has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, neglecting a client matter and misrepresenting the status of the matter to the client, failing to hold client funds in a trust account, failing to promptly return funds to a client, failing to return a client’s file in a timely manner, neglecting a conservatorship proceeding and failing to disclose the conservator’s conversion of estate assets, and omitting the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API