Legal Opinion
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Brehmer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 4, 2001No. C3-00-529PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
On March 20, 2000, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility served the respondent, David L. Brehmer with a petition for disciplinary action alleging that Brehmer had not complied with the conditions of his probation because he committed acts of professional misconduct while on probation. Brehmer failed to respond within the 20-day period allowed for responses. As a result, we ordered that the allegations contained in the petition were deemed admitted, and oral arguments were scheduled for June 1, 2000. Written proposals for appropriate discipline were due to us…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Matter of Discipline of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- In Re Complaint Concerning MieraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against PylesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against MadsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against GheritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against WestbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against WentzellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against BrehmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Assist Financial Services, Inc. v. Freight One Transportation, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.