Legal Opinion
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Anderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 29, 2009No. A07-2126PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
On November 9, 2007, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent John T. Anderson, Jr., committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline. Specifically, Anderson was charged with violation of the terms of an earlier probation, failure to cooperate with the Director, and neglect of a client matter in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.16(d), 8.1(b), and 8.4(d). A referee found that Anderson violated these Rules of Professional Conduct, along with the terms of his probation, and…
3Cases cited26 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Van Christo Advertising, Inc. v. M/A-COM/LCSMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against WestbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against De RyckeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against WentzellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against AitkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In re Disciplinary Action Against MontezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RoggemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Petition for Reinstatement of Clark Calvin GRIFFITH, II, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0175638Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016