Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Danielson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 18, 2001No. C4-00-863PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

We consider the appropriate sanction in an attorney discipline matter where an attorney has failed to comply with the terms of probation imposed after the attorney admitted unprofessional conduct and failed to cooperate with a related disciplinary investigation. We conclude that indefinite suspension from the practice of law is the appropriate sanction.

Respondent Michele Marie Danielson was admitted to practice law in Minnesota in 1988. In June 1999, she stipulated to being placed on private probation for client neglect and noncommunication, failure to satisfy a judgment, failure to…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RuffenachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against ThedensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against KinnunenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against OrrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MunnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RhodesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against EkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against De RyckeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. In Re Fagre-StroetzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API