Legal Opinion

Collins v. Scott

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1893No. 15174PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This action is brought to procure a vacation, as to the plaintiffs, of a judgment of foreclosure, and all proceedings thereunder, including a sale of the mortgaged premises, to have a certificate of sale and a sheriff’s deed declared void, for an accounting by the purchaser and his successor in interest of the rents and profits, and for a decree allowing plaintiffs to redeem the undivided three-tenths of said mortgaged premises on paying a like three-tenths of the amount found due upon an accounting on said mortgage, etc.

A demurrer was interposed to the amended complaint *448of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hall v. ArnottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Kelly v. McKibbenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Raynor v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Barber v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Monterey County v. CushingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Darsie v. DarsieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API