Legal Opinion

Horton v. Horton

California Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1941No. L. A. 16139PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

In this action in equity to set aside a decree for separate maintenance theretofore entered in an independent action between the parties hereto, defendant prevailed, and plaintiff brings this appeal upon the judgment roll. For convenience and brevity in this opinion John F. Horton, the plaintiff and appellant herein, will be called the husband, and Gallic Ella Horton, the defendant and respondent herein, will be designated as the wife.

The essential facts giving rise to the present controversy are as follows: On October 6, 1930, the wife, as plaintiff, brought the first suit for separate…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Brooks v. ForingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Lang v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. In Re: Charles Michael Harmon, Debtor. Charles Michael Harmon v. Donald KobrinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Verone Marin Fehlhaber, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Robert F. Fehlhaber, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API