Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Lippel

California Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1990No. S013741PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

51 Cal.3d 1160 (1990)

801 P.2d 1041

276 Cal. Rptr. 290

In re the Marriage of ANGELA and RONALD LIPPEL.

RONALD LIPPEL, Appellant,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent.

Docket No. S013741.

Supreme Court of California.

December 17, 1990.

COUNSEL

Stotter, Samuels & Chamberlin, Kevin L. Starrett, Richmond & Chamberlin, C. Rick Chamberlin, Kate Rockas, De Goff & Sherman and Richard Sherman for Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Steve White and Richard B. Iglehart, Chief Assistant Attorneys General, John H. Sugiyama, Assistant Attorney General, Morris Beatus, Josanna Berkow and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. DannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Electronic Funds Solutions v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Heidary v. YadollahiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Sickle v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Sporn v. Home Depot USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API