Legal Opinion

McCosker v. McCosker

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 11, 1954No. Civ. 8296PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Respondent parents brought an action against their son and his wife to have a resulting trust declared in certain real and personal property and for an accounting of the profits derived from said property. The trial court found that the parents owned an undivided one-half interest in the real and personal property, ordered that an account be taken by a referee, and upon the settlement of the referee’s final report, gave judgment accordingly. The son and his wife have appealed from said judgment, their appeal being filed by different counsel than the one who represented them in the trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lezinsky v. Mason Malt Whiskey Distilling Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Goldring v. GoldringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Kruckow v. LesserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Hannah v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Sipe v. McKennaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Grand v. GriesingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Hickson v. ThielmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Cleary v. County of StanislausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. No Slo Transit, Inc. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API