Legal Opinion

Goldring v. Goldring

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1949No. Civ. 16948PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Plaintiff obtained an interlocutory decree of divorce on October 8, 1947, on the ground of cruelty. The decree recites that by a stipulation entered into in open court, “plaintiff and defendant stipulated and agreed as to all matters embodied in this decree except the matter of whether or not plaintiff should obtain an interlocutory decree of divorce.” Custody of the two minor children of the marriage was awarded jointly to the parties, with the plaintiff to have physical custody and control at all times except on alternate week ends and during two weeks of the summer vacation period.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gavel v. GavelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Streeter v. StreeterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Fields v. FieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Lufkin v. LufkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Williams v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Grand v. GriesingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Kanner v. Globe Bottling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Nardoni v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Maurice L. Bein, Inc. v. Housing Authority of City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Hickson v. ThielmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API