Sipe v. McKenna
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
Defendants have appealed from a judgment cancelling, vacating and holding null and void a decree quieting title to real property in Los Angeles County rendered in an action entitled Catherine A. McKenna, Plaintiff, v. The Escrow Corporation, Herman A. Paulk, Mary Agnes Paulk et al., Defendants.
The court found that on or about June 21, 1930, for a valuable consideration, defendants Herman A. Paulk and Mary Agues Paulk made, executed and delivered to Alma Stiebitz their' promissory note secured by a deed of trust executed by them, and recorded in the office of the etiunty recorder, upon the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sipe v. McKennaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Seidell v. Tuxedo Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Tetenman v. MelekovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Barry v. All Persons Claiming, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kruckow v. LesserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- McCosker v. McCoskerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- McKenna v. Elliott & Horne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Weber v. WillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Keller v. Keller CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.