Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Fink
California Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1979No. L.A. 31132PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MANUEL, J.
Sybil Fink appeals from the order granting a new trial for legal error in the division of the parties’ real property in Florida. Max C. Fink cross-appeals in order to preserve his objections to the judgment.
In January 1972, Max filed a petition for dissolution of his 31-year marriage to Sybil and moved for a separate and early trial of the dissolution issue. The motion to bifurcate was granted; an interlocutory judgment of dissolution was entered in April 1974, with the court reserving jurisdiction as to all other issues. Sybil appealed, and the bifurcation procedure was…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- HUONG QUE, INC. v. LuuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Schmidlin v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- In Re Marriage of SheldonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- City of Hollister v. Monterey InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Van De Kamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.