Lezinsky v. Mason Malt Whiskey Distilling Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Troutt, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Theodore A. Bell, A. E. Cooley, A. Walter Allen and Percy V. Long for Appellants. Thomas P. Boyd, Morrison, Dunne & Brobeck, Garret W. McEnerney and McWilliams & Hatfield for Respondents.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is an action brought by two individuals as trustees for the creditors and stockhohlers of an expired California corporation having the name of Mason Malt Whiskey Distilling Company against an existing Nevada corporation of the same name, and two individuals, John and Clinton Mason, to have it declared that the stock of the corporate defendant possessed by the individual defendants is held by the latter in trust for the creditors and stockholders of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hecht v. SlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Norton v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Hamilton v. HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Butler v. HylandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Croley v. California Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Oyama v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Martin v. KehlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Burns v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.