Hannah v. Canty
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The purpose of this action was to declare a trust in certain lands in favor of plaintiff and incidentally that an accounting should be had between the parties to the action. The nature of the litigation is discussed in the opinion of the district court of appeal in Hannah v. Canty, 1 Cal.App. 225, [81 P. 1035], given upon the sustaining of the order of the lower court denying a motion for change of place of trial. At the trial plaintiff was successful, and defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion to set aside and vacate said judgment.
The court found that in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Green v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Donohoe v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Hannah v. CantyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Bodding v. HermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. Van GordenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Wilcox v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- McCosker v. McCoskerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.