Legal Opinion

Kruckow v. Lesser

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1952No. Civ. 18906PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, J. pro tem.

The defendants appeal from the judgment rendered against them upon the sole ground that it was excessive to the extent of at least $3,480. While appellants concede that there was a substantial conflict in the evidence upon the issues on which the judgment was predicated, nevertheless they contend that the trial court erred in weighing the evidence and hence we should modify the judgment or else order a new trial. In the language of appellants’ brief: “It is the contention of the appellants that while there was a conflict in the evidence, the plaintiff failed to maintain the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Estate of ShayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Leming v. Oilfields Trucking Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Strutt v. Ontario Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Grand v. GriesingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. County of Solano v. Vallejo Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API