Legal Opinion
No Slo Transit, Inc. v. City of Long Beach
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 24, 1987No. B020791PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEBRON, J. *
Petitioners appeal from a judgment of the superior court finding that the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (LACTC) did not abuse its discretion in certifying as adequate an environmental impact report (EIR) for the Los Angeles to Long Beach Rail Transit Project (the Project). LACTC would route the Project along Long Beach Boulevard in the City of Long Beach.
Petitioners are businessmen owning interests along Long Beach Boulevard. They assert that the chosen routing will adversely affect their businesses. Petitioners acknowledge that the EIR examined an exhaustive…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Arthur Silva v. James T. LynnCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- People v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Environmental Protection Information Center v. California Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Galante Vineyards v. Monterey Peninsula Water Management Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Rio Vista Farm Bureau Center v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Lincoln Place Tenants Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.