Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hamlin v. Collins

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1981No. 80-1235PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue before this court is whether mandamus is a proper remedy for appellant to pursue the back pay allegedly due to him. There is no question, based on past decisions of this court, that mandamus is proper under these facts. See State, ex rel. Colangelo, v. McFaul (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 200; State, ex rel. Martin, v. Columbus (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 261; State, ex rel. Osborn, v. Jackson (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 41; State, ex rel. Dean, v. Huddle (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 234; Monaghan v. Richley (1972), 32 Ohio St. 2d 190.

Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Monaghan v. RichleyOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State ex rel. Martin v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State ex rel. Osborn v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State ex rel. Dean v. HuddleOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State ex rel. Colangelo v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovernOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State ex rel. Gibbons v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State ex rel. Schneider v. Board of Education of North Olmsted City School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Baran v. FuerstOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Esselburne v. Ohio Dept. of AgricultureOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API