Legal Opinion
Esselburne v. Ohio Dept. of Agriculture
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 7, 1990No. Case 90AP-231PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFaulkner, J.
Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of his complaint pursuant to Civ. R. 12Q3X6). The basis for the dismissal was the expiration of the statutory limitations period set forth in R.C. 2743.16.
Construing as we must, the allegations of plaintiffs complaint as true, it appears that plaintiff, Peter C. Esselburne* was employed in February 1980 by defendant, the Ohio Department of Agriculture, and classified in the civil service system as an Attorney II, in which capacity plaintiff served through March 18, 1983. On that date, the Ohio Department of Agriculture informed plaintiff his position was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Velotta v. Leo Petronzio Landscaping, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- State ex rel. Alford v. Willoughby Civil Service CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovernOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State ex rel. Crockett v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rich v. Erie County Department of Human ResourcesOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Reese RefrigerationOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Loyer v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Mankins v. PaxtonOhio Court of Appeals · 2001