State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovern
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, J.
The threshold issue before this court is whether mandamus is an appropriate remedy, respondents contending that relator has adequate remedies at law by way of an action for money only, an action for declaratory judgment or an action for injunctive relief.
As to injunctive relief, necessarily it would be mandatory in nature since relator seeks to compel respondents to perform an alleged clear legal duty. The extraordinary remedy of mandatory injunction available in the court of common pleas is not a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law precluding exercise of the original…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State ex rel. Crockett v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Monaghan v. RichleyOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Martin v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State ex rel. Bennett v. LimeOhio Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Ohio AFL-CIO v. VoinovichOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Manley v. Walsh (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- State ex rel. Hodges v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1992
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.