Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Gibbons v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1984No. 83-386PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

In order for a writ of mandamus to issue the relators must establish a clear legal right to the relief prayed for; a clear legal duty upon respondents to perform the act requested; and that relators have no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Butler, v. Demis (1981), 66 Ohio St. 2d 123, 124 [20 O.O. 121]; State, ex rel. Akron Fire Fighters, v. Akron (1978), 54 Ohio St. 2d 448, 450 [8 O.O.3d 443].

Appellants argue that no legal right to back pay can be established before an appointment has occurred, regardless of the reasons for the failure to appoint. We…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Butler v. DemisOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State Ex Rel. Lynch v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State ex rel. Colangelo v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State ex rel. Pell v. City of WestlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State ex rel. Pennington v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bardo v. City of LyndhurstOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Morgan v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hungler v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State ex rel. Bednar v. City of North CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State, Ex Rel. Gill v. WintersOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API