State ex rel. Schneider v. Board of Education of North Olmsted City School District
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Schneider argues that he could not have established back pay with certainty in the previous mandamus action because he had not yet been *350reinstated. The board responds that the court of appeals could and did decide on back pay in the previous mandamus case and that, consequently, res judicata precludes Schneider from relitigating this issue here.
We have permitted a wrongfully excluded employee to obtain back pay in a mandamus action after he has been reinstated, Monaghan v. Richley (1972), 32 Ohio St.2d 190, 61 O.O.2d 425, 291 N.E.2d 462, State ex rel. Hamlin v. Collins (1984), 9 Ohio St.3d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Monaghan v. RichleyOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Cartmell v. DorrianOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State ex rel. Hamlin v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State ex rel. Rose v. JamesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Hamlin v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State ex rel. Minor v. EschenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Nichols v. Cuyahoga County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental DisabilitiesOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Johnson v. TalikkaOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Boggs v. Springfield Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Nichols v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation & Dev. DisabilitiesOhio Supreme Court · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.