Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Colangelo v. McFaul

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1980No. 79-1394PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant alleges that the Court of Appeals erred when it held that appellee had no clear legal duty to pay past compensation since the State Personnel Board of Review made no ruling concerning it and that she had an adequate remedy at law for it by commencing a separate action.

We agree. “An action in mandamus is maintainable by a reinstated public employee to recover compensation due him for the period of time during which he was wrongfully excluded from his employment, provided the amount recoverable is established with certainty.” State, ex rel. Martin, v. Columbus (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sorin v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State ex rel. Martin v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Crockett v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State ex rel. Weiss v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Madden v. Windham Exempted Village School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State ex rel. Villari v. City of Bedford HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State ex rel. Gibbons v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API