SAIF Corp. v. Leland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.
Employer Reedsport School District 105 and SAIF Corporation seek review of a final order in which the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (the Director) determined that surgery performed on claimant’s back was appropriate treatment for her condition. On review, employer contends that the Director either misunderstood or misapplied the substantial evidence standard in setting aside the order of the medical review unit (MRU) that held that claimant’s back surgery was not appropriate medical treatment. We conclude that the Director properly applied the substantial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Linn Care Center v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Birrer v. Principal Financial GroupCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Bingham v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Liberty Northwest Insurance v. MundellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008