Legal Opinion

Birrer v. Principal Financial Group

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 28, 2001No. 98-01138, 98-01097, 98-01095; CA A106163PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Claimant petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that upheld both employer’s denial of the continued compensability of injuries to her right and left wrists and its contemporaneous closure of the claim without an award of permanent disability. She argues that the Board improperly allowed employer to raise a ground for the denials that it did not mention in the denial letter and that it should have required a medical arbiter’s report before deciding the extent of her left wrist disability. We reverse and remand.

The issues in this case are primarily procedural. We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Croman Corp. v. SerranoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Blamires v. Clean Pak Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. SAIF Corp. v. LelandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Columbia Forest Products v. WoolnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. SAIF Corp. v. WartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Travelers Ins. Co. v. Arevalo (In re Comp. of Arevalo)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. Braden v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. SAIF Corp. v. WartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API