Legal Opinion
Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 22, 1990No. WCB 85-15946; CA A46569; SC S35840PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.
In this workers’ compensation case, the Court of Appeals concluded that the referee’s findings of fact, which were affirmed by the Workers’ Compensation Board, are not supported by substantial evidence. Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp., 94 Or App 362, 765 P2d 1245 (1988). Substantial evidence supports a finding when the record, viewed as a whole, permits a reasonable person to make the finding. ORS 183.482(8)(c). Because we conclude that the Court of Appeals did not correctly apply the substantial evidence standard of review, we reverse its decision and remand the case to the Court of Appeals.
In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. StarbuckOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Stovall v. Sally Salmon SeafoodOregon Supreme Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Fred Meyer, Inc. v. HayesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Reguero v. Teacher Standards & Practices CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Norden v. STATE, WATER RESOURCES DEPT.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Shakerin v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Tye v. McFetridgeOregon Supreme Court · 2006
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.