Bingham v. Employment Department
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Claimant seeks review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board denying him unemployment benefits. The Board concluded that claimant’s refusal to provide his employer with a written statement regarding work-related conduct was misconduct. ORS 657.176(2)(a).1 Claimant challenges the findings underlying that determination as being unsupported by substantial evidence, ORS 183.482(8)(c),2 and further asserts that those findings are not rationally related to the Board’s ultimate conclusions. The Steel Yard, Inc. v. Natl. Council on Comp. Ins., 127 Or App 267, 271, 873 P2d 332 (1994). We affirm.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Home Plate, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Steel Yard, Inc. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- SAIF Corp. v. LelandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.