Linn Care Center v. Cannon
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
The issue in this Workers’ Compensation case is whether the Board correctly determined that claimant’s back surgery was reasonable and necessary. On de novo review, we affirm. We write only to address the insurer’s contention concerning the application and effect of a Workers’ Compensation Department administrative rule.
The surgery in question was elective, and the insurer sought application of OAR 436-69-501, which provides, in part:
“ (3) When elective major orthopedic or neurological surgery is recommended, the insurer may recommend an independent consultation with a physician of insurer’s…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Bell Bros. Heating & Air Conditioning v. GwinnSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Shenandoah Products, Inc. v. WhitlockCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
- Winslow v. D & B MECHANICAL CONTRACTORSCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- SAIF Corp. v. LelandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Day v. S & S Pizza Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.