Legal Opinion
1000 Friends of Oregon v. Marion County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 2, 1992No. LUBA 92-085; CA A76830PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Marion County approved a comprehensive plan amendment, zone change and conditional use permit to ¿low petitioners 1 to expand an existing recreational vehicle (RV) park by installing 77 vehicle spaces and support facilities on land that is currently designated exclusive farm use and that has been used for growing Christmas trees. The county took “reasons,” “built” and “committed” exceptions to Go¿ 3 to support its decision. ORS 197.732; OAR 660-04-020; OAR 660-04-022; OAR 660-04-025; OAR 660-04-028. 1000 Friends of Oregon sought review by LUBA, which held that the county erred in connection…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Curry Co.)Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Cusma v. City of Oregon CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tigard Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Stevens v. City of Island CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Leathers v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Tigard Sand and Gravel, Inc. v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- SAIF Corp. v. LelandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.