Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Engebretsen

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1911No. L.A. No. 2656PublishedCited by 36 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. W. E. Guy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an action by an abutting property-owner to enjoin the city council of San Diego and Engebretsen, as contractor under a street-grading contract, from proceeding to reduce the street surface in front- of the plaintiff’s property to the established grade. It is alleged that if the level of said street is made to conform to the established grade, as proposed, the plaintiff’s property, at the east end, will be fifteen feet above the level of the street and that, at the west end, the street will be eleven feet higher than the surface of his property, and that the consequence of the doing of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. People v. Town of OntarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Orosi Public Utility District v. McCuaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API