People v. Town of Ontario
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Tirey L. Ford, Ex-Attorney-General, IT. S. Webb, Attorney-General, C. E. Sumner, and Henry M. Willis, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is an action in the nature of quo warranto, brought to determine the validity of certain proceedings whereby defendant, a municipal corporation of the sixth class, claims that certain territory lying adjacent to the town of Ontario has been annexed to and is now a part of said town. Defendant had judgment in the court below, and this is an appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The annexation proceedings were had under…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Fragley v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Stumpf v. Board of Supervisors of San Luis Obispo CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People ex rel. Shumway v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Weber v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Wheeler v. HerbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Orosi Public Utility District v. McCuaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.