Duncan v. Ramish
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action to enjoin the city treasurer of the city of Los Angeles from executing a deed to the purchasers for certain lots sold by him for the non-payment of bonds issued under proceedings for a street improvement. An answer was filed, the cause was tried by the court, and judgment given for the defendants. The motion of the plaintiffs for a new trial was denied. The appeal is from the order denying the new trial and from the judgment.
The appeal from the judgment is ineffectual, because taken, or attempted to be taken, after the time for such appeal had expired. It may therefore be…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Kelly v. PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Tarpey v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Larsen v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.