Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
The plaintiff petitioned the superior court of the county of Madera for a writ of review for the purpose of inquiring into the validity of an order of the defendant board of supervisors calling an election for the establishment of an irrigation district, to be known as the Madera Irrigation District. A demurrer for want of sufficient facts and alleging lack of jurisdiction was interposed and sustained by the trial court and judgment was rendered against the plaintiff in pursuance of such ruling on demurrer. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment.
[1] The respondents moved to dismiss the…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People Ex Rel. Rogers v. LetfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- Orosi Public Utility District v. McCuaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Lehi City v. Meiling, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Brock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.