Legal Opinion
Orosi Public Utility District v. McCuaig
California Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1925No. Docket No. Sac. 3682PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.
The Orosi Public Utility District was organized under the provisions of an act providing for the incor poration of public utility districts in unincorporated territory. (Stats. 1921, p. 906.) The board of directors of the district brought an action in the superior court of the county of Tulare to determine the validity of an |18,000 bond issue voted by the people of the district for the purpose of raising money for developing, pumping, storing, and distributing water. John F. McGuaig, a resident freeholder and taxpayer, answered the petition, alleging that all proceedings in relation to the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- People Ex Rel. Rogers v. LetfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- State of California v. Marin Municipal Water Dist.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Lehi City v. Meiling, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Gaynor v. MarohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.