Legal Opinion

In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation District

California Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1891No. 14157PublishedCited by 220 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The board of directors of the Madera Irrigation District, on the 25th of May, 1889, filed in the *306superior court of the county of Fresno, in pursuance of the act of March 16,1889 (Stats. 1889, p. 212), a petition for the confirmation by that court of their proceedings for the issue and sale of certain bonds of said district, amounting to eight hundred and fifty thousand dollars. In their petition, they alleged that “ said Madera Irrigation District was duly organized under the laws of the state of California, and especially under the provisions of the act approved March 7, 1887 ” (Stats. 1887,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. People Ex Rel. Griffin v. Mayor of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  3. Lowell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. Lent v. TillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. People Ex Rel. Herrick v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1860

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by220 opinions

  1. People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State Bar of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

215 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API