Legal Opinion
Bacich v. Board of Control
California Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1943No. S. F. 16832PublishedCited by 191 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
The demurrers of defendants Board of Control, California Toll-Bridge Authority and State Department of Public Works to plaintifE’s complaint for damages in this action in inverse condemnation were sustained without leave to amend.
PlaintifE alleges that he is the owner of an improved lot situated on the west side of Sterling Street between the intersection of that street with Bryant Street and Harrison Street in the City and County of San Francisco, the two latter streets being parallel; that before the construction of the improvement hereinafter mentioned Harrison Street was level with…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Davis v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- In re Melon StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Liddick v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by191 opinions
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- DuPuy v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.