Legal Opinion
City of San Diego v. Millan
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 17, 1932No. Docket No. 1038PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an original proceeding instituted in this court for the purpose of -compelling respondent to invest certain surplus funds, now in the treasury of the City of San Diego, in bonds of that city. Respondent has appeared by a demurrer to the petition, thereby admitting all of its material allegations.
The City of San Diego is a municipal corporation organized and existing under a freeholders’ charter. The individual petitioners are the mayor and members of the council of that city. Respondent is its treasurer.
In accordance with the provisions of an act of the legislature of the state of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Manigault v. SpringsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Salt Lake City v. Utah Light & Traction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
- Peery v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- O'Farrell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dolan v. Borough of TenaflySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Board of Supervisors v. RechenmacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- City of Crescent City v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- County of San Diego v. PerrigoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- City of Redding v. HollandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.