Legal Opinion
O'Farrell v. County of Sonoma
California Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1922No. S. F. No. 9968PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants to obtain an injunction regarding the making of unlawful contracts and the unlawful expenditure of the proceeds of certain county bonds. The defendants appeared and filed a general demurrer. The demurrer was sustained. The plaintiff declined to amend and judgment was entered in favor of the defendants for their costs. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment.
In his verified complaint the plaintiff incorporates copies of certain records, and in the interest of simplicity, in stating the substance of the allegations we will…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peery v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Thompson v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Whitner v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
- Haws v. County Court of Wayne CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
- Jenkins v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Metropolitan Water Dist. v. MarquardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Wheeler v. Board of Trustees of Fargo Consolidated School DistrictSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Uhl v. BadaraccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Salt Lake City Corp. v. Jordan River Restoration NetworkUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- County of San Bernardino v. WayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.