Legal Opinion
City of Crescent City v. Griffin
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 1939No. Civ. 6208PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.
This is an original proceeding in mandamus instituted by petitioner, the City of Crescent City, a municipal corporation, against the respondent, E. R. Griffin, as City Clerk of said City of Crescent City, for the purpose of compelling the respondent to countersign certain general obligation bonds of the City of Crescent City alleged to have been authorized by the qualified electors of said city at an election held on the 28th day of September, 1937. An alternative writ of mandate was issued by this court, and the agreed facts follow.
Petitioner, City of Crescent City (hereinafter for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Peery v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- O'Farrell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Skinner v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Murphy v. City of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Hellman v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Northridge Park County Water District v. McDonellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- First National Bank & Trust Co. of Wyoming v. BrimmerWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
- City of Redding v. HollandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- City of Burlingame v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- FIRST NATIONAL BANK & TRUST CO. OF WYO v. BrimmerWyoming Supreme Court · 1973