Legal Opinion

Dolan v. Borough of Tenafly

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 30, 1977PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mountain, J.

Plaintiffs are taxpayers of the Borough of Tenafly. They brought this action to test the validity of an ordinance and supplemental resolution which authorized the borough’s acquisition of a certain tract of land, to be funded in part by the issuance of bonds. Defendant municipality moved for summary judgment, and the motion was granted. Plaintiffs appealed to the Appellate Division, and we granted certification while the appeal was there pending unheard. 71 N. J. 517 (1976). Because of the desirability of an early announcement of our…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Farrell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. City of San Diego v. MillanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Sacramento-Yolo Port District v. RoddaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mini Mart, Inc. v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Matlack v. Burlington Cy. Bd. of Chosen FreeholdersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  3. Mount Laurel Tp. v. Mipro HomesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  4. Deland v. Township of BerkeleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  5. Matlack v. BURLINGTON CTY. FREEHOLDER BD.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API