Peery v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J.,
pro tem.—In these two cases there are three appeals: One by Herbert Peery and one- by H. W. Anderson, plaintiff and intervener, respectively, in the first of said actions, and one by H. W. Anderson, as plaintiff in the second of said actions. The same questions are presented upon each of said appeals. These actions were each instituted for the purpose of obtaining an injunction against the defendant city of Los Angeles and its officials, restraining it and them from disposing of certain municipal bonds of said city for less than the par value thereof, or upon terms which would…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brownell v. . Town of GreenwichNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Uhler v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Merchants National Bank v. Escondido Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Lawson v. County Court of Kanawha CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
- Skinner v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Wheeler v. Board of Trustees of Fargo Consolidated School DistrictSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- City of Santa Clara v. Von RaesfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- County of San Diego v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- O'Farrell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- County of San Bernardino v. WayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.